Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,759
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety - DPS
as 24-6605
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant: NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, -DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, SERGEANT HESTER and others
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff: NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
Vincent Mona v. David McKay
as 24-1536
Plaintiff: VINCENT P. MONA
Defendant: DAVID F. MCKAY
James Rose v. Bryan Stirling
as 24-6556
Plaintiff: JAMES ROSE
Defendant: BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections
B.J.P. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6388
Plaintiff: B.J.P.
Defendant: SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (SCDC), By and Through Its Director, Bryan P. Stirling, SCDC DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, in his Individual and Official Capacities, SCDC DEP. DIR. DENNIS PATTERSON, in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
US v. Anthony Spencer
as 24-4298
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ANTHONY P. SPENCER
Diana Mey v. William Pintas
as 24-1494
Plaintiff: DIANA MEY, on behalf of herself and a class of others similarly situated
Defendant: WILLIAM PINTAS, P&M LAW FIRM, LLC, P&M LAW FIRM (PR), LLC and others
David Little, Jr. v. John Palmer
as 24-6516
Plaintiff: DAVID ANTONIO LITTLE, JR.
Defendant: JOHN PALMER, Warden, BRYAN P. STIRLING, Director, T. ROBERTSON, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Bruno Mpoy v. State of Maryland
as 24-1474
Plaintiff: BRUNO K. MPOY, Individually and as a Next Friend of T.M. and C.M.
Defendant: STATE OF MARYLAND, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND, MARCY WAXMAN and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?