Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Roman Perdono v. Felix Taylor
as 23-6965
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROMAN DALACIO PERDONO
Respondent / Appellee:
FELIX TAYLOR and ROBERT C. LEWIS
Cathy Brentzel v. AIG Property Casualty Company
as 21-2239
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY MARIE BRENTZEL and ESTATE OF ROBERT C. HACKER
Defendant / Appellee:
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Cathy Brentzel v. Fairfax Transfer and Storage,
as 21-1025
Defendant / Appellee:
FAIRFAX TRANSFER AND STORAGE, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY MARIE BRENTZEL, Individually and as Personal Representative of Robert C. Hacker, Deceased
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ROBERT C. HACKER
R.M.S. Titanic, Incorporated v. US
as 20-1936
Defendant:
D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Secretary of Commerce, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
R.M.S. Titanic, Inc. v. US
as 20-1684
Defendant:
D. JAMES BAKER, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, WILLIAM M. DALEY, Administrator, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, United States Department of Commerce, THE WRECKED AND ABANDONED VESSEL, its engines, tackle, apparel, appurtenances, cargo, etc., Located within one (1) nautical mile of a point located at 41 degrees 43' 32" North Latitude and 49 degrees 56' 49" West Longitude, believed to be the RMS TIT and others
Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
R.M.S. TITANIC, INCORPORATED, successor in interest to Titanic Ventures, limited partnership
Davetta Range v. Jeff Bezos
as 20-1349
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney/Owns TP USA, BLACK LIVES MATTER TORONTO, TURNING POINT USA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVETTA LYNN RANGE
Davetta Range v. Dana Van Metre
as 20-1345
Defendant / Appellee:
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, BRIAN A. JACKSON, SA RACHEL ROLLINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVETTA LYNN RANGE
Harry Quigley v. Steve Williams
as 19-1564
Defendant / Appellee:
OMAR ABOULHOSN, each and all in their individual, non-judicial capacities, ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, CITY OF HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARRY LAWRENCE QUIGLEY
Robert Barchiesi v. Charlotte School of Law, LLC
as 19-1161
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MORGAN SWITZER, 17CV39 ASH, RAISSA LEVY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIDI OGENE, CHARLOTTE SCHOOL OF LAW, LLC, JAY CONISON and others
Defendant:
STERLING PARTNERS, STERLING CAPITAL PARTNERS IV, LLC and INFILAW HOLDING, LLC
Appellant:
ARIEL CARTER, KAYTLIN RUZICKA, REBECCA APPELBAUM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT C. BARCHIESI, Individually and in a Representative capacity on behalf of a class of all persons similarly situated and LEJLA HADZIC, Individually and in a Representative capacity on behalf of a class of all persons similarly situated
Daniel Herrera v. Charlotte School of Law, LLC
as 19-1148
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MORGAN SWITZER, 17CV39 ASH, RAISSA LEVY and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C. BARCHIESI, Individually and in a Representative capacity on behalf of a class of all persons similarly situated and LEJLA HADZIC, Individually and in a Representative capacity on behalf of a class of all persons similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIDI OGENE, INFILAW CORPORATION, CHARLOTTE SCHOOL OF LAW, LLC and others
Appellant:
CHARLES HORNACK, BRENT FINNELL, KARINA RAHALL and others
Defendant:
STERLING PARTNERS, STERLING CAPITAL PARTNERS IV, LLC and INFILAW HOLDING, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
