Cases 1 - 10 of 59
William Abner v. US
as 24-1492
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARVEY, JOHN MARCUM, EDGAR NEFF and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arthur Sanford v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6964
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR LEE SANFORD
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Dir.; Virginia DOC, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia DOC and CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia DOC
US v. James Sanford
as 23-4539
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES LEWIS SANFORD
US v. Roderick Sanford
as 23-6807
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RODERICK LAMAR SANFORD
Benjamin Vient v. Sanford Herald
as 23-1208
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN VIENT
Defendant / Appellee:
SANFORD HERALD and PAXTON MEDIA GROUP LLC
Roderick Sanford v. US
as 22-7450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODERICK LAMAR SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Warden Brian K. Dobbs)
Kenneth Sanford v. City of Franklin, Virginia
as 22-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. SANFORD and KENNETH SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FRANKLIN, VIRGINIA, SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR and SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Kenneth Sanford v. City of Franklin
as 22-2030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH L. SANFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF FRANKLIN, VIRGINIA, SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR and SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
GuideOne Mutual Insurance Co. v. Beulah Baptist Church
as 21-109
Respondent:
HENRIETTA SANFORD, BEULAH BAPTIST CHURCH OF DEANWOOD HEIGHTS, D.C., LISA S. TURNER and others
Petitioner:
GUIDEONE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
