Cases 41 - 50 of 434
Godwin v. Lowery
as 5:2022ct03026
Plaintiff:
Percell Godwin
Defendant:
Officer Lowery and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meineke Franchisor SPV, LLC v. Cochran et al
as 5:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
MEINEKE FRANCHISOR SPV, LLC
Defendant:
SIDNEY O. COCHRAN, JR., SHERRY COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL COCHRAN and others
Counter Claimant:
DISCOUNT MUFFLERS, INC. d/b/a Bruno's Automotive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jones v. Baker et al
as 5:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
LaTreka Jones
Defendant:
Gerald M. Baker, Unknown Insurance Company and Jet Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hernandez-Velasque v. Robeson County, et al
as 7:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Celsa Hernandez-Velasque
Defendant:
Johnson Britt, Ken Sealey, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Losoya-Herrera v. Unknown named agents of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022ct03001
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Losoya-Herrera and Rodolfo Ledezma-Herrera
Defendant:
Unknown named agents of Federal Bureau of Prisons and Unknown named agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nave v. Unknown
as 5:2021ct03351
Plaintiff:
Charles Nave
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Unknown
as 5:2021hc02232
Petitioner:
Rodger Hanson
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flowers v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2021ct03305
Plaintiff:
Earl Flowers
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2021ct03304
Plaintiff:
Larry Brandon Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, State of North Carolina, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Laybourn et al
as 5:2021ct03295
Plaintiff:
Trevor Eugene Reed
Defendant:
Dr. Katherine Laybourn, Dr. Mark Dicocco, Ms. Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
