Cases 1 - 10 of 517
Tolbert v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02121
Petitioner:
Richard Tolbert
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Polidi v. Boston et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Louis Boston, David Shewchuk, Charletta Blackshear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Kwasny et al v. NewRez, LLC
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard J Kwasny, Jill W Kwasny and Ronald Wisla
Defendant:
NewRez, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Kaul et al v. Oetken et al
as 5:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul, Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
James Paul Oetken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00353
Plaintiff:
William Richard Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Cobbs v. Harrell et al
as 5:2024ct03106
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elroy Cobbs
Defendant:
Richard K. Harrell and Ricardo Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. Braswell et al
as 7:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. WARREN, JR.
Defendant:
TYLER BRASWELL, North Carolina Department of Insurance and John Doe
Respondent:
New Hanover County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grissett v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02038
Petitioner:
Richard Hugh Grissett
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bertoncini v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Richard Bertoncini and Lynda Bertoncini
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hjort v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Richard Hjort
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
