Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 91 - 100 of 24,000
JOHNSON v. UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00433
Plaintiff: RICHARD LEWIS JOHNSON
Defendant: UNKNOWN STATE OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMSON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff: TORSHAZO WILLIAMSON
Defendant: CAPTAIN MR. BROWN, SAM PAGE, CAPTAIN MS. JENNIFER BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00427
Petitioner: JAKE ROBERT KELLY
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BROWN v. NOYES EDGE et al
as 1:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: RODNEY BROWN
Defendant: OFFICER #1 J.P. NOYES EDGE and OFFICER #2 T.H. REECE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. ROSS et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff: RICKEY BANKS
Defendant: RYAN ROSS, ELIZABETH WATERS, MICHAEL HUGGINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00419
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DEAN v. BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00417
Plaintiff: HALEY DEAN
Defendant: BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC and BLUEGRASS HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00425
Petitioner: RICKY ALLEN WILLIAMS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
KING v. ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00426
Petitioner: ROBERT CHARLES ANTHONY KING
Respondent: ALAMANCE DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SEAN BOONE, MAGGIE BREWER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FREEMAN et al v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY FREEMAN and C. B.
Defendant: MARBELY SANCHEZ, GREGORY J. SEABOLT and CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?