Cases 11 - 20 of 24,013
ARCHER v. CABARRUS COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DISTRICT COURT DIVISION et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
RODNEY D. ARCHER
Defendant:
CABARRUS COUNTY COURTHOUSE, DISTRICT COURT DIVISION, JUDGE CHRISTY WILHELM, JUDGE ELIZABETH STREET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOLEY v. FISHER et al
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
ELDMOND BOLEY
Defendant:
FISHER, ROWAN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and LIEUTENANT DEBLASI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTLEDGE v. RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. RUTLEDGE
Defendant:
SHANNON RUTLEDGE-CHAMBERS, DUKE UNIVERSITY, RHINE RESEARCH CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
VANESSA WHITE SMITH
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MIAL BEY v. HOOKS
as 1:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
YUSUFI BURTON MIAL BEY
Respondent:
ERIK HOOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY v. CRAWFORD et al
as 1:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
GENWORTH LIFE AND ANNUITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
PATRICIA COX CRAWFORD, SETH R. BERKY, BRANDY B. SHEWCOW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
HELTON v. GILLENWATER et al
as 1:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
RUFUS ALEXANDER HELTON
Defendant:
GEORGE GILLENWATER and PATRICK MCCRARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COSTON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
CARL YOUNG COSTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MITCHELL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00522
Petitioner:
MARIO KEVON MITCHELL
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00523
Petitioner:
JAMIE DUANE THOMAS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
