Cases 81 - 90 of 24,013
LUFKIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
NILDA LUFKIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
FULLTHROTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. ROCKET MEDIA, LLC
as 1:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
FULLTHROTTLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Defendant:
Rocket Media, LLC (d/b/a Launch Labs) and ROCKET MEDIA, LLC d/b/a LAUNCH LABS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DEESE et al v. FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. et al
as 1:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEESE and JEANNE DEESE
Defendant:
FKH SFR PROPCO K, L.P. and FIRSTKEY HOMES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
NEPTUNE v. COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2024cv00471
Plaintiff:
FRANTZ NEPTUNE
Defendant:
COBBLE RIDGE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION and DAVID J. DARIGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SEWELL v. BOP
as 1:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
DAVID ERIC SEWELL
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
AL-BAYYINAH v. JAMES
as 1:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
JATHIYAH A. AL-BAYYINAH
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMEL JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
GATEWOOD v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
ERIC GATEWOOD
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BANILLA GAMES, INC. et al v. FUEL SMART 6 INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
BANILLA GAMES, INC. and GROVER GAMING, INC.
Defendant:
FUEL SMART 6 INC., FUEL SMART 9 INC. and FUEL SMART 13 INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MOORE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00462
Petitioner:
ARCHIE FULTON MOORE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
