Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
UPCHURCH v. OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY et al
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff: Timothy Upchurch
Defendant: OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY, THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Godwin Elevator Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00835
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
GODWIN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00402
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GODWIN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
GODWIN v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00113
Plaintiff: MICHAEL GODWIN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
GODWIN v. COLVIN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv01217
Plaintiff: KEVIN WOODELL GODWIN
Defendant: CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
GRAVES v. ANDREWS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00154
Plaintiff: SCOTTIE LEE GRAVES
Defendant: MIKE ANDREWS , JULIAN COUCH , GODWIN MENSAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAVES V. ANDREWS ET AL
as 1:2011cv01109
Plaintiff: SCOTTIE LEE GRAVES
Defendant: MIKE ANDREWS, JULIAN COUCH, GODWIN MENSAH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00725
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ANDREW, et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00090
Plaintiff: HERBERT ALLEN ANDREW , JAMES P. APLINGTON , JACK C. DIXON and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?