Cases 51 - 60 of 186
Arroyo v. Superintendent "John Doe" et al
as 2:2021cv00313
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Defendant:
Captain(s) "John Doe", NS Superintendant "John Doe", The City of Newport News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Lt. "John" Ward
as 2:2021cv00315
Defendant:
Sgt. "John" Casper, Lt. "John" Ward, Captain(s) "John Does" and others
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo v. Boyer et al
as 2:2021cv00314
Plaintiff:
Amos Jacob Arroyo
Defendant:
Hampton Roads City Jail, Captain(s) "John Doe" ET. AL., The City of Newport News and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dallas v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00349
Defendant:
M Syes, Baldwin, Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon Dallas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Booth v. Shifflett et al
as 2:2021cv00290
Defendant:
Nurse Morefield, Head-Nurse Darden, Colonel Mark Shifflett and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Thomas Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Jarrell et al
as 2:2021cv00243
Defendant:
C. Creque, Captain B. Claude, A. Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Dave Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter-El v. Daughty et al
as 1:2021cv00442
Plaintiff:
Zamal'iah Asia-Unique Carte-El and Zamal'iah Asia-Unique Carter-El
Defendant:
Dr V Bakhshi, Sheriff Daughty and Captain R. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myrick v. Hurlock et al
as 1:2021cv00109
Defendant:
1st Sgt. Allen, 1 Sgt. Nadgi, Major Oburne and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Orlando Myrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keating v. Hudson et al
as 1:2021cv00079
Defendant:
Luitenet Ried, Captain Diehl and Superintendent Hudson
Plaintiff:
Robert P. Keating
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Hudson et al
as 3:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
Michael Harris
Defendant:
Captain Diehl, Superintendent Kevin Hudson and Major McRae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
