Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bradshaw et al v. The West Virginia Department of Natural Resources et al
as 2:2021cv00021
Plaintiff:
Terri Bradshaw, Blake Bradshaw, Shane Shilling and others
Defendant:
The West Virginia Department of Natural Resources, Sergeant Jeff Craig, Captain Douglas Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson et al v. High Road Operating, LLC
as 5:2020cv00229
Plaintiff:
Mary Caldwell, William Robinson, Matthew Schmitt and others
Defendant:
High Road Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peppers v. Armel et al
as 5:2019cv00327
Defendant:
Davis, Sapp, Pollocl and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Peppers v. Myers et al
as 3:2019cv00189
Defendant:
DHO Officer D. Huff, Amy Armel, Officer Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Peppers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Johnson v. Kallis
as 2:2017cv00148
Plaintiff:
Dontez Johnson
Defendant:
S. Kallis, Jared Rardin, J. A. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. O'Brien et al
as 2:2014cv00030
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Wilson
Defendant:
Terry O'Brien, John Doe, J. Gully and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blake v. Squires et al
as 2:2013cv00073
Plaintiff:
Thomas O Blake
Defendant:
Squires, G Miller, N Lotsopirch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horton v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2009cv00114
Plaintiff:
Roy Horton
Defendant:
Wesley Dobbs, Officer Benson, B. Kimball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. G & S Tobacco Dealers, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00102
Plaintiff:
Nicole Benson and Nicole Benson
Defendant:
G & S Tobacco Dealers, LLC, Jass Video Investments, LLC and Cynthia (Cindy) Woodward
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
