Cases 131 - 140 of 126,592
Ward v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Ward
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baisi v. Western Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips et al v. Galisky
as 2:2024cv00158
Petitioner:
Dustin Phillips and Aaron Hallof
Respondent:
Darren Galisky
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Cornell v. West Virginia Division of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Dee Anna Cornell
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sadie v. Hartford Insurance Co., of the Midwest
as 2:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Marie Sadie
Defendant:
Hartford Insurance Co., of the Midwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Baire v. Winters et al
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Rickey Baire
Defendant:
Zachary Winters, Adam Mason and The City of Dunbar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Marselleen Lynne Hopkins
as 3:2024cv00065
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Whittington v. Goins et al
as 1:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Angela Renee Whittington and Goins
Defendant:
Perry Dale Goins, The Bank of America Corporation and doing business as Merrill, Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Kiser v. Tincher et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Etta Kiser
Defendant:
Dep. Josh D. Tincher, Dep. Erwin Williams and Mingo County Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
