Cases 21 - 30 of 126,587
Batten v. Anderson Equipment Company
as 2:2024cv00291
Plaintiff:
Joshua Batten doing business as B. J. Industries, an entity doing business in the State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Anderson Equipment Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Hightower v. Kelly
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Randy Hightower
Defendant:
Lt. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP v. McVey et al
as 2:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Defendant:
Allan McVey, Patrick J. Morrisey and West Virginia Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Grand Central Parkersburg LLC v. Shoe Show, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Grand Central Parkersburg LLC
Defendant:
Shoe Show, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
In Re: Ethan Hoke, Michael Lee Roselle, Tyler Ray Young - Petit Jury Service
as 5:2024mc00112
Cause Of Action: Contempt Proceedings
Sigmon v. Hughes
as 2:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Sigmon
Defendant:
William Frederick Hughes, Sr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lindsey v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Shaun Lindsey
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Trull v. West Virginia Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
Devan Trull
Defendant:
Mag Mutual Insurance Company and West Virginia Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
