Cases 41 - 50 of 126,536
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Barnett v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Betty Barnett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Tom's Plumbing, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moore
Defendant:
Tom's Plumbing, Inc. doing business as Mullen Plumbing, Heating and Cooling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ruth Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cook et al v. Hull Property Group, LLC
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tiffany N. Cook and Jason D. Cook
Defendant:
Hull Property Group, LLC a Georgia LLC doing business as Charleston Town Center Mall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Su v. Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
as 2:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Ben's Creek Operations WV LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. $11,123.00 from Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$11,123.00 From Moneygram International, Inc., Money Orders
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Marco Hernandez
Defendant:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
