Other Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 756
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019md02879
Consolidated Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
US v. Steven Prentice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-7126
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE
Iyanna Anderson v. Seat Pleasant Police Department We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant: IYANNA ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee: SEAT PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF MARYLAND, Attorney General, LIEUTENANT HEYWARD, (0159) and others
Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01177
Plaintiff: Northern Virginia Hemp and Agriculture, LLC, Rose Lane and Franny's Operations, Inc.
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia, Glenn Youngkin, Jason S. Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of State Statutes
In re: Jason Kokinda We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2130
Petitioner: In re: JASON STEVEN KOKINDA
Joslynn Howard v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 23-1898
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSLYNN TONJUA HOWARD and WINFRED HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee: NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Defendant: REES BROOME, SFMC, JOSEPH M. GOLDBERG and STEVEN KRIEGER
FTC v. Andris Pukke
as 23-1742
Plaintiff / Appellee: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellant: ANDRIS PUKKE, a/k/a Marc Romeo, a/k/a Andy Storm, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco, PETER BAKER, individually and as an officer or owner of Global Property Alliance, Inc. (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, The Reserve, Kanantik, Laguna Palms, Bamboo Springs, Eco Futures, Eco Futures Development, Eco Futures Bel and JOHN USHER, individually and as an officer or owner of Sittee River Wildlife Reserve (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and The Reserve) and Eco-Futures Belize Limited (also doing business as Sanctuary Bay, Sanctuary Belize, and
Defendant: ECO-FUTURES BELIZE LIMITED, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a California Corporation, ECO FUTURES DEVELOPMENT, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, a company organized under the laws of Belize, BUY BELIZE, LLC, d/b/a Sanctuary Bay, d/b/a Sanctuary Belize, d/b/a The Reserve, d/b/a Kanantik, d/b/a Laguna Palms, d/b/a Bamboo Springs, a California limited liability company and others
Respondent: CROSS-FREDERICK ASSOCIATES, LLC and FOLEY & LARDNER LLP
Not Classified By Court: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor: THE HAMPSHIRE GENERATIONAL FUND LLC, DAVID PORTMAN, JULIE SANTOS and others
Trustee: CHAPTER 11 TRUSTEE
Receiver: MARC-PHILIP FERZAN
Rockwell et al v. Kougl, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02454
Plaintiff: TARA LEIGH PATRICK, DENISE TRLICA, JESSICA HINTON and others
Defendant: KOUGL, INC. doing business as CLUB HAREM and STEVEN J. KOUGL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Mark Zaid v. Department of Justice We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1821
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARK STEVEN ZAID
Defendant / Appellee: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Nessel et al v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company et al
as 2:2020cv03307
Defendant: Rockwood Systems, Inc., Verde Environmental, Inc., Denko, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Dana Nessel and Michigan, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Resource & Recovery Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?