Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,024
Melody Rodgers v. US We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1214
Plaintiff / Appellant: MELODY RODGERS
Plaintiff: BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Latasha Woolridge v. US
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant: LATASHA WOOLRIDGE
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Kathrine Thomas v. US
as 23-1256
Plaintiff / Appellant: KATHRINE THOMAS
Plaintiff: BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, LORA BYERS and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Teresa Goin v. US
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERESA GOIN
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Thorpe et al v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00007
Defendant: Denise Malone, A. David Robinson, Tori Raiford and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Cottrell, Brian Cavitt, Peter Mukuria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christina Anderson v. US
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTINA ANDERSON
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
King et al v. Smith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00129
Plaintiff: Jan King and Kimberly Maynard
Defendant: Phyllis Smith, Scott Caserta, Samantha McCollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brenda Blue v. US
as 23-1266
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRENDA BLUE and DANIEL BLUE
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Keshia Holliman v. US
as 23-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant: KESHIA HOLLIMAN, a/k/a Keshia Horton
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Malachi Chapman v. US
as 23-1264
Plaintiff / Appellant: MALACHI CHAPMAN
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?