Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 632
TyQashia Sellers v. US
as 23-1381
Plaintiff / Appellant: TYQASHIA SELLERS
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lois Gibson v. State of Maryland
as 23-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOIS ANN GIBSON, MARYLAND 20-20 WATCH, FREDERICK, MARYLAND, CLASS REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23, AND/OR PUTATIVE CLASSES OF SIMILARLY SITUATED VOTERS OF MARYLAND AND/OR ELSEWHERE IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant / Appellee: THE STATE OF MARYLAND, and Several Agencies of the State, Including at least the State and County Boards of Elections in the Specific Counties Listed herein, A STATE AND NATIONAL RICO ENTERPRISE, IN PART LOCATED IN MARYLAND, AND/OR DOING BUSINESS AS PART OF THE COMMERCE IN MARYLAND WITH COUNTIES, I.E., FREDERICK, HOWARD COUNTY, CARROLL COUNTIES, MARYLAND AND 18 ADDITIONAL COUNTIES OR VOTING JURISDICTIONS, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE (CTCL), A Chicago IRS Code 501 (c) (3) Corporation and others
Taylor v. United States of America We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff: William Taylor
Defendant: United States of America
Bell et al v. Unknown named IRS employee author of I.R.M. 25.25.10-1 et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff: Timothy James Bell, United States ex rel, United States of America ex rel and others
Defendant: Unknown named IRS employee author of I.R.M. 1, Neil Schoonmaker, IRS employee number 1000143350 and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. ยง 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Laurie Reynolds v. US
as 23-1287
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAURIE REYNOLDS
Plaintiff: CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT, GLENDA CODY and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Latasha Woolridge v. US
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant: LATASHA WOOLRIDGE
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Gerri Hood v. US
as 23-1284
Plaintiff / Appellant: GERRI F. HOOD
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Barbara Mast v. US
as 23-1285
Plaintiff / Appellant: BARBARA MAST
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Teresa Goin v. US
as 23-1283
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERESA GOIN
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Christina Anderson v. US
as 23-1268
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTINA ANDERSON
Plaintiff: LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?