Land Condemnation Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK) v. .025 Acres More or Less of Land located at 1006 North Payson Street in Baltimore City, Maryland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv02158
Defendant: Yvette Wormley, The Estate of Lula Thrower, Testate and Intestate Successors of Lula Thrower and others
Plaintiff: National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 421 Complaint in Condemnation - Eminent Domain
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 4.69 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald Deboe and Kim G. Deboe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00049
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 4.69 Acres of Land, Owned by Donald Deboe and Kim G. Deboe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 0.94 Acres of Land, Owned by Martin G. Morrison and Patricia A. Boyd
as 7:2022cv00317
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 0.94 Acres of Land, Owned by Martin G. Morrison and Patricia A. Boyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 3.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Nancy H. Weatherford, John G. Mitchell and Phyllis H. Mitchell, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
as 4:2022cv00066
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 3.73 Acres of Land, Owned by Nancy H. Weatherford, John G. Mitchell and Phyllis H. Mitchell, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant: 1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. Easements to Construct, Operate, and Maintain a Natural Gas Pipeline Over Tracts of Land in Pittsylvania County, Virginia, Including: et al
as 4:2021cv00002
Defendant: 1.71 Acres of Land, Owned by David Lee Adams and Teressa H. Adams, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 2.60 Acres of Land, Owned by Faye L. Lowe and Glenn Anthony Lowe, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 5.36 Acres of Land, Owned by Dana H. Sparks, Trustee of the Billie Anne Harmon Living Trust, Easement Claimed by Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
The County Commission of Harrison County v. Olymbec USA LLC et al
as 1:2020cv00034
Respondent: Robert G. Matheny, Sheriff of Harrison County, West Virginia and Olymbec USA LLC
Petitioner: The County Commission of Harrison County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-010.000 et al
as 5:2019cv00113
Defendant: Georgiann G. Martin, Any Unknown Owners, Jeffrey C. Martin and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-MA-ML-001.610 et al
as 5:2019cv00042
Defendant: Kelley Jo Davis, Holly Ochsenbein, Robert G. Ruckman and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-TY-SHC-066.000 and WV-TY-SHC-066.970 et al
as 5:2019cv00064
Defendant: Any Unknown Owners, Sarah K. Boley, Rover Tract No(s). WV-TY-SHC-066.000 and WV-TY-SHC-066.970 and others
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?