Cases 61 - 70 of 279
STUBBS v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILRWAY COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00439
Plaintiff:
BRADY D. STUBBS
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stubbs v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00432
Plaintiff:
Brady D Stubbs
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MABE v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00424
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MABE
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LINDSAY v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
as 1:2018cv00406
Plaintiff:
BOBBY W. LINDSAY
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
YOUNG v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
AARON S. YOUNG
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Muhammad v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 2:2018cv00020
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Muhammad
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Manivannan v. Bochenek
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Ayyakkannu Manivannan
Defendant:
Grace Bochenek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Piccolo v. United States of America Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv01366
Plaintiff:
Jason Piccolo
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Homeland Security, Richard Murphy and Christopher Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MULL v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
BLAINE MULL
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and C&S RAIL SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Jerome v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 0:2017cv02315
Plaintiff:
Richard A Jerome
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Resolute FP US Inc
Cross_claimant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cross_defendant:
Resolute FP US Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
