Cases 91 - 100 of 180
Samuel et al v. Mulford
as 1:2018cv01417
Defendant:
Abc Employer I-X, John Does I-X, Melinda B. Mulford and others
Plaintiff:
Augustus A. Samuel, Sr. and Robyn M. Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry et al v. Gypsum Express LTD. et al
as 3:2018cv02704
Plaintiff:
William Fry and Jessica Fry
Defendant:
Kenneth Edwards, John Doe and Gypsum Express LTD.
Undetermined:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Overbye Transport Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00626
Plaintiff:
Rose Tatum Jones
Defendant:
John Doe and Overbye Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White v. Ottley et al
as 3:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Carol White
Defendant:
John Doe and Jerome Ottley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hayes v. Doe
as 7:2018cv00316
Defendant:
John Doe and Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois
Plaintiff:
Jackson Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sgiers v. Lamers Bus Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Kathie Wilson Sgiers
Defendant:
Lamers Bus Lines, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tu v. U-Haul Co of South Carolina Inc et al
as 2:2018cv00734
Plaintiff:
Kueilin Lu Tu
Defendant:
U-Haul Co of South Carolina Inc , U-Haul Co of North Carolina , John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCDANIEL, et al v. FIRST TRANSIT, INC., ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00169
Plaintiff:
RUTH KAY MCDANIEL
Defendant:
FIRST TRANSIT, INC. and JOHN DOE AND/OR ABC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Welling et al v. Hastings et al
as 3:2017cv00114
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Welling and Eloise Welling
Defendant:
Howard Hastings, III, Vicki Kaiser (Hastings) and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beachy et al v. Kramer-Casey Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02700
Plaintiff:
Kevin Beachy and Kayla Parks
Defendant:
Kramer-Casey Enterprises, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
