Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Rashid v. The Lane Construction Corporation
as 3:2015cv00615
Plaintiff:
Margaret Rashid
Defendant:
The Lane Construction Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Conigliaro et al
as 1:2013cv03318
Plaintiff:
Ayanna Lawhorn Jones
Defendant:
Lane Elizabeth Conigliaro and Carla Lane Conigliaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Cooper et al
as 0:2013cv01681
Plaintiff:
Brandy James Morris
Defendant:
Misty Lane Cooper and Wanda Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Stuckey v. Burleson
as 4:2012cv02383
Plaintiff:
Rayford Stuckey
Defendant:
David Lane Burleson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Macklin v. Wiggleworth et al
as 8:2011cv01131
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Macklin
Defendant:
Mark Wiggleworth and Lane Construction Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dillon et al v. Soltese et al
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Kimberlyn Dillon and Larry Dillon
Defendant:
Keith Soltese, Jr. , Kathleen Lane and Westfield Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Merritt v. Mattison et al
as 7:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Merritt
Defendant:
Russell Lane Mattison, Russell Lane Mattison, WardLaw Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Merritt v. Mattison et al
as 4:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
Rose Ann Merritt
Defendant:
Russell Lane Mattison, Russell Lane Mattison, WardLaw Trucking, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
LANE v. CROYLE, JR. et al
as 7:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
ROYCE DEXTER LANE
Defendant:
RAYMOND CROYLE, JR. and MVT SERVICES, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Lane v. Tuttle et al
as 0:2007cv03172
Plaintiff:
Christy Lane
Defendant:
Charles Dean Tuttle, Jr, Charles Dean Tuttle, Jr, Celadon Trucking Service Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
