Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Meadows v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27326
Plaintiff:
Franklin E. Meadows
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27179
Plaintiff:
Franklin D. Stewart
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopkins v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26612
Plaintiff:
Cleo Franklin Hopkins
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv24248
Plaintiff:
James Franklin Smith
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newbanks v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv18730
Plaintiff:
Paul Franklin Newbanks, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
H.M.D. v. Jones et al
as 3:2014cv00175
Plaintiff:
H.M.D.
Defendant:
Derek O. Jones, County School Board of Northumberland County , David Franklin Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodle v. Adams-Robinson Enterprises, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00467
Plaintiff:
Johnny Franklin Woodle
Defendant:
Adams-Robinson Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin v. Golden Corral Corporation
as 3:2013cv00510
Plaintiff:
Yikese Franklin
Defendant:
Golden Corral Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Atakora v. Franklin et al
as 8:2012cv02072
Plaintiff:
Timbuk Kofi Atakora
Defendant:
Robert B. Franklin, Kenneth Haymes and Rick Turpin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clyde Bennett v. R&L Carrier
as 10-2242
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLYDE L. BENNETT
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID JOHN MCGINNIS, SR. and R&L CARRIERS SHARED SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
R L CARRIERS, INCORPORATED, a/k/a R&L Carriers, Incorporated, a/k/a R L Carriers, a/k/a R&L Carriers, FRANKLIN FINLEY, JAY BULLARD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
