Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ray Kifer, Jr. v. Harry Crow, Jr.
as 23-1949
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RAY KIFER, JR.
Defendant / Appellant:
HARRY B. CROW, JR., as Administrator of the Estate of Landric Reid, DAVID SPENCER, in his individual capacity, KYLE BEAM, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
ANSON COUNTY and DAVID SCOTT BURROUGHS, in his individual capacity
Paszek-Lowman v. Caldwell County et al
as 5:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Administrator Madeline Loraine Paszek-Lowman and Madeline Loraine Paszek-Lowman
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Sheriff Alan C. Jones, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Johnson
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education and Cathy Beam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kifer v. Burroughs et al
as 3:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Ray Kifer, Jr.
Defendant:
Jimmy Williams, David Scott Burroughs, Josh Beam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pahlke et al v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al
as 3:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Michael S. Johnson, Rolando Leal, Adam Harczuk and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Long and Paige L. Pahlke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cv
Gray v. Bunge Oil et al
as 3:2020cv00915
Defendant:
Shaun Jones, Jennifer Beam, Mona Pratt and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hugh Gray, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fields et al v. Fields et al
as 3:2019cv00042
Defendant:
Fields Family, Putnam Beams Carpenters and Brian Christopher Fields
Plaintiff:
Damon Emil Fields and Carole P Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Beam v. Tatum
as 07-1719
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK H. BEAM
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE TATUM, Commissioner, North Carolina Division of Motor Vehicles, BRYAN BEATTY, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Crime Control and Public Safety and LYNDO TIPPETT, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Transportation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
