Cases 141 - 150 of 1,035
Bell v. Paypal, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bell
Defendant:
Paypal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bell v. Paypal, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bell
Defendant:
Paypal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Corinthian Stack v. Brock & Scott, PLLC
as 22-1152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORINTHIAN STACK and LYNN K. STACK
Defendant / Appellee:
BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, CHAD WILSON BURGESS, individual, GREGORY T. WHITLEY, individual and others
Ibrahim v. Vizio Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Jibril L. Ibrahim
Defendant:
Vizio Corporation, Self Storage Plus, Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Darlene Gibbs v. Michael Stinson
as 22-1017
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DARLENE GIBBS, STEPHANIE EDWARDS, GEORGE HENGLE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL STINSON, LINDA STINSON, 7HBF NO. 2 LTD. and others
Gibbs et al v. Haynes et al
as 3:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Darlene Gibbs, Stephanie Edwards, Lula Williams and others
Defendant:
L. Stephen Haynes, Haynes Investments, LLC and Sovereign Business Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVA v. SWIFT
as 1:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Andrew Chien v. Edward Robbins, Jr.
as 22-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW CHIEN
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD ANSON ROBBINS, JR., FREDERICK G. ROCKWELL, III, WENDY S. HUGHES and others
SILVA v. SWIFT et al
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT and NASHVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
City of Norfolk VA v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
City of Norfolk, VA
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
