General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 141 - 150 of 36,649
COTE v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02859
Petitioner: RICHARD PAUL COTE
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anderson v. Hayes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv01241
Plaintiff: Michael Isaiah Anderson, Jr
Defendant: Loy Hayes, J. Ryan White, Karen Parrott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haney v. Beckwith
as 2:2024cv01716
Petitioner: Tron L. Haney
Respondent: Warden Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Ishee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00138
Petitioner: Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent: Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. Harris
as 7:2024cv00226
Petitioner: Keith Edward Moss
Respondent: C.N. Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brandon Pickens v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6439
Petitioner: BRANDON MICHAEL PICKENS
Respondent: TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Raminder Kaur v. Robert Green
as 24-6440
Petitioner: RAMINDER KAUR
Respondent: ROBERT L. GREEN and CAROL HARMON
Bardomiano Martinez v. Steven Jacobs
as 24-6251
Petitioner: BARDOMIANO MARTINEZ
Respondent: WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS
Rembold v. Bohrer et al
as 1:2024cv01328
Petitioner: Donald G. Rembold
Respondent: William S. Bohrer and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britney Bates v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6431
Petitioner: BRITNEY ODELL BATES
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, in his official capacity as Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?