General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 36,658
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner: DAVON TATE
Respondent: WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Stutler v. Tate
as 5:2024cv00103
Petitioner: Aric Jason Stutler
Respondent: Ditmaus Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner: Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent: Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heck v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02108
Petitioner: Jeffery Stephen Heck
Respondent: Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harper v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02109
Petitioner: Terek Harper
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Director Department Corrections
as 1:2024cv00976
Petitioner: Herbert William Jones, Jr.
Respondent: Director Department Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adames v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner: Alexander Adames
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. Brockenborough et al
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff: Kevin Donnell Murphy
Defendant: Monique Brockenborough and United States Department of State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Petitioner: Antwarn Lee Rogers
Respondent: Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bastas v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02105
Petitioner: Andreas Peter Bastas
Respondent: State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?