Cases 11 - 20 of 36,712
Palacio v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02118
Petitioner:
Jairo Palacio Palacio
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vines v. Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
Clayton Vines
Respondent:
Commonwealth Of Virginia Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Global Tel Link Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00393
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Defendant:
Global Tel Link Corporation, ViaPath Technologies and Todd E Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Todd Giffen v. Warden FMC Rochester
as 24-6590
Petitioner:
TODD MICHAEL GIFFEN
Respondent:
WARDEN FMC ROCHESTER
William Marable, Jr. v. Mecklenburg Circuit Court
as 24-6591
Petitioner:
WILLIAM I. MARABLE, JR.
Respondent:
MECKLENBURG CIRCUIT COURT and VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Kasyjanski v. Gaffeny
as 1:2024cv02274
Petitioner:
Keith Edward Kasyjanski
Respondent:
Erin Gaffeny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Graves v. State of North Carolina
as 1:2024cv00502
Petitioner:
LANCE SAMUEL GRAVES
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Russini v. Virginia DOC
as 7:2024cv00388
Petitioner:
Jennifer M. Russini
Respondent:
Virginia DOC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv01059
Petitioner:
Michael Alonzo Robinson, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Safrit v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02116
Petitioner:
Matthew A. Safrit and Matthews Aaron Safrit
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
