General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 235
Shakur v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02093
Petitioner: Saliq Shakur
Respondent: Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2023cv01104
Petitioner: David Kelly
Respondent: State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mobley v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02088
Petitioner: Deshawn Donta Mobley
Respondent: Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Oladokun v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02083
Petitioner: Oladayo Oladokun
Respondent: Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
El-Alamin v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02081
Petitioner: Malik Al Mustafa El-Alamin
Respondent: Warden L.B. Kelly and Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clark v. Clarke We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv00223
Petitioner: Kelly James Clark
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02076
Petitioner: Kejuan Evans
Respondent: Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Michael Moller v. Warden Kelly
as 23-6366
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL J. MOLLER
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN KELLY, FCI Butner 2
Keith v. Kelly et al
as 5:2023hc02064
Petitioner: Anin M. Keith
Respondent: Warden Kelly and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fairlamb v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02045
Petitioner: Scott Fairlamb
Respondent: Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?