Cases 71 - 80 of 1,437
Cox v. Bivens
as 1:2022cv01942
Petitioner:
John Cox
Respondent:
Warden Carlos Bivens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Elder v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6985
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN CHRISTOPHER ELDER
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia D.O.C.
Hartman v. Lanham
as 3:2022cv00136
Petitioner:
John Andrew Hartman
Respondent:
Brian Lanham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clyburn v. Buffaloe et al
as 3:2022cv00408
Petitioner:
Mr. Henry Lee Clyburn and Henry Lee Clyburn
Defendant:
Mr. Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr., John Sapper and Eddie M. Buffaloe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ragin v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00418
Petitioner:
John Ragin
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Jeffery Artrip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. Bivens et al
as 1:2022cv01466
Petitioner:
Thomas John Grant
Respondent:
Carlos Bivens and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John McKinnon v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6666
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN LAMONT MCKINNON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections and HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Virginia Dept. of Corrections
John Johnson v. Donnie Ames
as 22-6679
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RODNEY JOHNSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE AMES, Superintendent
McKenzie v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00123
Petitioner:
John W. McKenzie
Respondent:
R. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Epps v. Gilley
as 3:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
Robert Junior Epps
Respondent:
John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
