Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Heck v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02108
Petitioner:
Jeffery Stephen Heck
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Covarrubias v. Crawford et al
as 2:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Nicolas Salinas Covarrubias
Respondent:
Jeffery Crawford, Dept of Homeland security and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
John Ragin v. Chadwick Dotson
as 23-6955
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN RAGIN
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of Department of Corrections, JEFFERY ARTRIP, Warden and CHADWICK DOTSON
Acker v. North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02124
Petitioner:
Jeffery Ray Acker
Respondent:
North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Phetteplace v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
Jeffery Phetteplace
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gregory Gary v. Harold Clarke
as 22-7304
Petitioner / Appellant:
GREGORY TYRONE GARY, a/k/a Gregory Tyrone Gary-Bey
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and JEFFERY B. KISER, Warden, Red Onion State Prison
Ragin v. Clarke et al
as 2:2022cv00337
Petitioner:
John Ragin
Respondent:
Director Harold Clarke and Jeffery Artrip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ragin v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00418
Petitioner:
John Ragin
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Jeffery Artrip
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mollohan v. State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2021cv00153
Petitioner:
Jeffery Earnest Mollohan
Respondent:
State of West Virginia, Salem Correctional Center and Braxton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Olaniyi v. Crawford
as 1:2020cv01339
Petitioner:
Olaitan Michael Olaniyi
Respondent:
Jeffery Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
