Cases 1 - 10 of 662
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden of Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 24-6394
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Ezeah v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02083
Petitioner:
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah
Respondent:
Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
James L. Brown
Respondent:
K. Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlos Hernandez v. Joshua Stein
as 24-6131
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Respondent:
JOSHUA STEIN and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS
Scott v. Joseph
as 2:2024cv00735
Petitioner:
Anthony Scott
Respondent:
K. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Nelson, Warden
as 2:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Kemonie Lashawn Jones
Respondent:
K. Nelson, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Cobble v. Warden Edgefield Federal Correctional Institution
as 24-6053
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE, a/k/a Johnathan Wayne Plemons
Respondent:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION EDGEFIELD
Hakeem v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00255
Petitioner:
Okerayi K. Hakeem
Respondent:
H. Ray, Z. Moore and P. Betschart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Smith, Jr. v. Warden, Tyger River Correctional Institution
as 23-7289
Petitioner:
ROBERT DAVIS SMITH, JR., a/k/a Robert David Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
WARDEN, TYGER RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Grant Anderson v. Maryland Attorney General
as 23-7273
Petitioner / Appellant:
GRANT ANDERSON, a/k/a Jibril Luqman Ibrahim
Respondent / Appellee:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
