Cases 1 - 10 of 75
RICHES v. SHAHZAD et al
as 1:2010cv00494
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
FAISAL SHAHZAD and UMAR FAROUK ABDULMUTALLAB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riches v. FAMM et al
as 3:2009cv00785
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
FAMM, Julie Stewart, Mary Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riches v. South Africa et al
as 3:2009cv00330
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
South Africa, African National Congress, Inc., Thabo Mbeki and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Riches v. Evanovich et al
as 6:2009cv00198
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jonathan Riches v. Netspend Corporation
as 08-8172
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
NETSPEND CORPORATION, MPOWER VENTURES LP, GRUPO OMNILIFE SA and others
Jonathan Riches v. Uwe Boll
as 08-8178
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
UWE BOLL, JUDSON LAIPPLY, ERIC TANNENBAUM and others
Jonathan Riches v. Leo Schweitzer
as 08-8025
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
LEO F. SCHWEITZER and WARDEN, FCI Williamsburg
Jonathan Riches v. Thomas Lamb
as 08-7965
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS P. LAMB and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Jonathan Riches v. Marshall Safir
as 08-7967
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
MARSHALL P. SAFIR and WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg
Jonathan Riches v. Harold Haimowitz
as 08-7972
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD HAIMOWITZ, WARDEN, Federal Correctional Institution Williamsburg and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
