Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Williams v. Wainwright et al
as 8:2020cv03407
Petitioner:
Desmond A. Williams
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General and Simon Wainwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bailey v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2016cv00706
Petitioner:
Brent Scott Bailey
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOP Director Samuels, DSCC Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Smalls v. Newport News Circuit Court
as 3:2015cv00721
Petitioner:
Chris V. Smalls
Respondent:
Newport News Circuit Court
Defendant:
D. Simons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Simons
as 2:2013cv00437
Petitioner:
Robert Smith
Respondent:
David L. Simons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2012hc02269
Petitioner:
Simon Reed
Respondent:
United States Of America, United States Parole Commission and Brick Tripp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barrie v. Lucero et al
as 1:2011cv01410
Petitioner:
Abdulai Barrie
Respondent:
Enrique Lucero , David L. Simons, John T. Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HALL EL et al v. SIMONS et al
as 1:2011cv01061
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SALAAM HALL EL and JULIUS LUCAS ALI-EL
Respondent:
DAVID L. SIMONS and CHERYL FOOTMAN-BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bernard McFadden v. Simon Major
as 11-7161
Petitioner - Appellant:
BERNARD MCFADDEN
Respondent - Appellee:
SIMON MAJOR, Director of Sumter-Lee Regional Detention Center
Mansoor v. Simons
as 1:2011cv00849
Petitioner:
Khusro Afaq Mansoor
Respondent:
David L. Simons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gary Williams v. David L. Simon
as 11-6993
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID L. SIMON, Superintendent
Respondent:
DAVID L. SIMMONS, Superintendent and DAVID SIMONS, Superintendent
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
