Cases 21 - 30 of 126
Vaughan v. Lancaster County Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
Lancaster County Police Department, L. E. G. and Ursula E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Lancaster County Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Defendant:
Lancaster County Police Department, L. E. G. and Ursula E. March
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Baltas v. Rollin Cook
as 22-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE BALTAS
Defendant / Appellee:
ROLLIN COOK, In His Individual and Official Capacities -a Connecticut DOC employee
Al-Mutawakkil v. Andrews et al
as 3:2021cv00387
Defendant:
Eracka Young, J. Andrews, B.O.P. Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Hanif K. Al-Mutawakkil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vaughan v. U.S. Department of Treasury et al
as 1:2021cv01141
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Treasury and U.S. Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Donald Doc Vaughan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Avin v. Darlington County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2021cv00651
Defendant:
T. Dop., T.N. Department of Probation and Parole, Darlington County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Donavan Avin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunley v. DOC
as 2:2021cv00057
Plaintiff:
Robert James Hunley
Defendant:
DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braxton v. Red Onion State Prisons Medical Department et al
as 7:2021cv00051
Defendant:
S. Fletcher, Regional Director, B. Witt and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Troy Braxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fly v. DOC/WCI
as 1:2020cv03310
Defendant:
DOC/WCI
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Fly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Black v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2020cv02380
Defendant:
State of Maryland, JCI, DOC and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
