Cases 21 - 30 of 764
Terry v. Jane Doe No. 1 et al
as 7:2024cv00386
Defendant:
Western Virginia Regional Jail, Dr. John Doe No. 1, Dr. Jane Doe No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Shea Terry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Michael Alonza Rufus
Defendant:
Prince, Lucas, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. John and Jane Doe 1-5
as 0:2024cv03673
Plaintiff:
Ricky Roderick Price
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shields v. Tibbs et al
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jacob Shields
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe and Lt. Timothy Tibbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rufus v. Vasquez et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Defendant:
Vasquez, Thompson, McWilliams and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Rufus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Posey v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2024cv00123
Defendant:
Nancy E. Oldaker, John/Jane Doe, Heather Gross and others
Plaintiff:
Dakota Allen Posey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adonnis Shepheard, Sr. v. Shelby Searls
as 24-6451
Plaintiff:
ADONNIS R. SHEPHEARD, SR.
Defendant:
SHELBY SEARLS, Warden, JOHN DOE, Correctional Officer, JANE DOE, Nurse and others
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaddy v. Alexander Correction Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Brandon A Gaddy and Brandon A. Gaddy
Defendant:
Alexander Correction Institution, FNU Panero, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. McMillian
as 24-6495
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, DULA, Correction Officer, COX, Nurse and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
