Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Antonio Kelley v. Motsumi Moja
as 16-7635
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO LORENZO KELLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MOTSUMI MOJA, Medical Doctor, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, (CCS), CORIZON, Medical and others
Kelley v. Corizon et al
as 3:2016cv00808
Plaintiff:
Antonio Kelley
Defendant:
Corizon and Riverside Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Moja et al
as 3:2016cv00704
Plaintiff:
Antoine L. Kelley
Defendant:
Motsumi Moja, Correct Care Solutions, Corizon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
El v. Clark et al
as 2:2016cv02339
Plaintiff:
Bakha Yawuti El
Defendant:
Tyler Clark, Antonio Gantt, Korey Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. McClung, et al.
as 1:2016cv01880
Plaintiff:
Curtis Gibson
Defendant:
Dr. McClung, Correct Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettus v. Stanley et al
as 1:2016cv00299
Plaintiff:
Rakim Pettus
Defendant:
Stanley, M. Taylor and Michelle Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelley v. Coxe et al
as 6:2015cv03583
Plaintiff:
Leroy Kelley
Defendant:
Investigator Coxe, Leroy Cartledge, Scott Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher v. Pocomoke Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv01588
Plaintiff:
Andre' Tyrone Fisher
Defendant:
Pocomoke Police Department, Crisfield Police Department, Somerset County State's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 5:2014ct03327
Plaintiff:
Ernest Rowland
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Kenny Atkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marvin J. Moody v. Todd B. Perseghin
as 13-7089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARVIN J. MOODY
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD P. PERSEGHIN, Detective R.P.D. #2985
Defendant:
CAITLIN R. KELLEY, Assistant Commonwealth Atty and CLARENCE N. JENKINS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
