Cases 31 - 40 of 256
Boykins v. Taylor et al
as 7:2022cv00726
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dontrell Boykins
Defendant:
Officer Taylor and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Hampton Roads Regional Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00447
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Whitfield
Defendant:
Hampton Roads Regional Jail and Hampton Roads Regional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfoot v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Rodney William Lightfoot
Defendant:
Clent D. Davis, M. Maurice and M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Richland County et al
as 8:2022cv02541
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Butler
Defendant:
Richland County, Shane Kitchen, Mauricre Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
WILLIAMSON v. SCOTALND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
MAURICE A. WILLIAMSON
Defendant:
SCOTALND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byers v. Yellen, et al
as 1:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Maurice Jaquan Byers
Defendant:
Janet Yellen and Charles Rettig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalls v. The State Of Maryland et al
as 1:2022cv01095
Plaintiff:
Anthony Maurice Smalls
Defendant:
The State Of Maryland, Judge William Dellbring, Judge Michael R. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Preston Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Ofc. Thompson, Ofc(s) of A&B Day & Night Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Gregory
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
Miss. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Locklear et al
as 5:2022ct03057
Plaintiff:
Maurice Anderson
Defendant:
Mary Locklear, Roy Cooper and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
