Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Vazquez v. Norwood et al
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Samuel Cedeno Vazquez
Defendant:
Norwood, Moreno and Holloman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Wyatt et al
as 5:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Shelby Wyatt, Jonathan Call, FNU Tilley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iona Sass v. The City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2023cv01856
Plaintiff:
Iona Sass
Defendant:
The City of North Charleston, South Carolina, Melvin Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Norwood v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Timothy Norwood
Defendant:
Susan Smith and Judge Mahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. The West Virginia State Bar, et al
as 5:2021cv00479
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Norwood
Defendant:
The West Virginia State Bar, Office of Disciplinary Counsel and E. Lavoyd Morgan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Hooks et al
as 5:2020ct03303
Plaintiff:
Keri Damont Thompson and Keri D. Norwood
Defendant:
Erik Hooks, Darren Bruce, Beauford Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Jividen et al
as 2:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Donald F. Ames, Wexford, Inc., Daniel L. Conn and others
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Bynum et al
as 5:2019cv00604
Defendant:
Jhon Doe and Trooper M. Bynum
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. E. Lavoyd Morgan Jr., Associates L.C. et al
as 5:2019cv00491
Plaintiff:
Travis R. Norwood
Defendant:
E. Lavoyd Morgan, Jr. and E. Lavoyd Morgan Jr., Associates L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Wright et al
as 7:2017cv02436
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamon Byrd
Defendant:
Charles L Wright , Spartanburg County Sheriff's Department , Spartanburg County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
