Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Garcia-Ramos v. Medical Director John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Abraham Garcia-Ramos
Defendant:
Medical Director John Doe and Yes Care Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Ramo's et al
as 1:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Marvin Maurice Moore
Defendant:
Ramo's, Treachy and Focus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Ramos v. Doe
as 1:2023cv02091
Plaintiff:
Abraham Garcia Ramos
Defendant:
Dr. John/Jane Doe and Robert Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Snead v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2023cv00309
Plaintiff:
King Cedric Omar Snead
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Western State Hospital, Dr. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lott v. Dube et al
as 6:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Mark T Lott, Mark Lott and Mark Tillman Lott
Defendant:
Dr. Michelle Dube, Eric Ramos, Ron Lawrenz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
RAMOS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLOREZ RAMOS
Defendant:
KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLORES-RAMOS v. ATRIUM HEALTH
as 1:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL FLORES-RAMOS
Defendant:
ATRIUM HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANGEL MEDRANO RAMOS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
