Cases 31 - 40 of 168
Pilgrim v. Wright et al
as 2:2018cv03187
Defendant:
C P Hayes, John and Jane Does, Chuck Wright and others
Plaintiff:
Willie E Pilgrim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Chipp v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018ct03262
Plaintiff:
Kelvin G. Chipp
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe, Dr. Roscoe Ramsey and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roudabush v. Hollembaek et al
as 5:2018ct03104
Plaintiff:
James L. Roudabush, Jr.
Defendant:
S. Hollembaek, S. Butler, Lt. Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Garnett et al
as 2:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
William S. Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
James Garnett, Donald Hunter, Piedmont Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders-El et al v. Hehenberger et al
as 1:2017cv00879
Plaintiff:
Antonio J Saunders-El
Defendant:
John Doe , Jane and/or John Doe, John Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
Keith B. Porterfield
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan P. Stirling , Lefford Fate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Hunter et al
as 1:2016cv01245
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sanchez
Defendant:
Donald Hunter, Wade Bartlett, Lorita Dodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Madden v. Jones et al
as 2:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Keon Madden
Defendant:
LT. Jones, Adcock, Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Harned v. US
as 16-6733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH V. HARNED
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN SARA M. REVELL, ASSOCIATE WARDEN CAMPOS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, BUTNER FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and others
Hammond v. Doe et al
as 1:2015cv04808
Plaintiff:
John H Hammond
Defendant:
John Doe, Nurse Williams, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
