Cases 1 - 10 of 391
Michael Gorbey v. Assistant Warden Crickard
as 24-6418
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey, a/k/a Michael S. Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
CRICKARD, FCI Estill S.C., COMMISSARY STAFF DUERK, FCI Estill S.C., COUNSELOR PLATTS, C-B; FCI Estill S.C. and others
Johnson v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv02634
Plaintiff:
Dennis James Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Gary Hancock, Jr. v. US
as 24-6368
Plaintiff:
GARY WARREN HANCOCK, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Davila v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2024ct03092
Plaintiff:
Noel Davila
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forrest v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Kevin Forrest
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terrence Russell v. United States
as 24-6276
Plaintiff:
TERRENCE RENARD RUSSELL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Umar Adeyola v. Edavally Reddy
as 24-1244
Plaintiff:
UMAR ADEYOLA
Defendant:
DR. EDAVALLY REDDY, JENNIFER ADKINS, MS. BUNN and others
Lamm v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Kevin Allen Lamm
Defendant:
United States of America, Mr. McCrae, Ms. Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
