Cases 71 - 80 of 450
BAILEY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
JEANIE DIANE BAILEY
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Sammy M. Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ambrose v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Ambrose
Defendant:
S Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Mary Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hager v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00432
Plaintiff:
Shane Edward Hager
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Durham v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
Willie Durham
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gustafson v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00474
Plaintiff:
Peter Thomas Gustafson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
QUICK v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Crystal Quick
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Lape v. Kijakazi
as 7:2023cv00470
Plaintiff:
Joshua A. Lape
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Canady v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Nikki Lashaun Canady
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
