Cases 1 - 10 of 17
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. NICHOLSON et al
as 1:2020cv00050
Interpleader:
MONIQUE NICHOLSON, THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, RASHARRON COLLIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
as 3:2019cv00410
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Monique Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Edwards II et al
as 1:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Kenya T. Edwards II, K. d. E., K. m. E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jefferson et al v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Lourie Jefferson and Monique Brown
Defendant:
Quicken Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Almy v. Sebelius
as 1:2012cv00856
Plaintiff:
Monique D. Almy
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Almy v. Sebelius
as 1:2011cv03691
Plaintiff:
Monique D. Almy
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Almy v. Sebelius
as 1:2011cv00598
Plaintiff:
Monique D. Almy
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Woodrow et al v. Maksin Management Corp et al
as 3:2010cv02898
Plaintiff:
Monique Woodrow and John Robert Peace PA
Defendant:
Maksin Management Corp and Standard Security Life Insurance Company of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Monique Almy v. Michael Leavitt
as 10-2241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONIQUE D. ALMY, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Bionicare Medical Technologies, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services
Almy v. Sebelius
as 1:2010cv02755
Plaintiff:
Monique D. Almy
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
