Cases 31 - 40 of 51
RE/MAX, LLC v. M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd et al
as 5:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd and Matthew L. Jones
Counter_claimant:
Matthew L. Jones and M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd
Counter_defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
RE/MAX, LLC v. M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd et al
as 4:2012cv00279
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
M.L. Jones & Associates, Ltd and Matthew L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
ACES HOLDINGS, LLC v. MATTHEWS SPECIALTY VEHICLES, INC.
as 1:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
ACES HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
MATTHEWS SPECIALTY VEHICLES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc. v. Negri et al
as 3:2011cv00293
Defendant:
Matthew Negri and Exhaust Pro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Meineke Car Care Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Goslee v. Applause Catering Inc et al
as 3:2011cv01027
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Goslee
Defendant:
Applause Catering Inc and James Player
Counter_claimant:
James Player
Counter_defendant:
Matthew Thomas Goslee
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Argus NeuroOptics, LLC v. Matthews
as 4:2011cv00030
Plaintiff:
Argus NeuroOptics, LLC
Defendant:
Charles J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Argus NeuroOptics, LLC v. Matthews
as 5:2011cv00084
Plaintiff:
Argus NeuroOptics, LLC
Defendant:
Charles J. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
v. Classic Kitchens of Virginia, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00723
Plaintiff:
Franko-LaFratta Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Classic Kitchens of Virginia, Inc. and Matthew Gunn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Harris et al v. Seto et al
as 7:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Harris and M. F. Harris Research Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey K. Seto, Deep Blue Inc., Kevin Kendrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
