Intellectual Property Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 69
SULLIVAN v. PINCHUK
as 1:2015cv00473
Plaintiff: DANIEL BARBER SULLIVAN
Defendant: NICK PINCHUK
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Kametani v. Fei
as 1:2015cv00583
Plaintiff: Daniel Kametani
Defendant: Luo Fei
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Luxe 55 LLC v. Daniel O Reich Inc
as 2:2015cv01235
Plaintiff: Luxe 55 LLC
Defendant: Daniel O Reich Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
7-Eleven, Inc. v. 7 Even, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03316
Plaintiff: 7-Eleven, Inc.
Defendant: 7 Even, Inc. and Daniel Geda
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
The Manella Group, Inc. v. Cornerstone Chiropractic Marketing Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00449
Plaintiff: The Manella Group, Inc.
Defendant: Cornerstone Chiropractic Marketing Inc. and Daniel Handford
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
MCKENZIE SPORTS PRODUCTS, LLC v. DAN RINEHART'S TAXIDERMY ARTS SUPPLY COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv00325
Plaintiff: MCKENZIE SPORTS PRODUCTS, LLC
Defendant: DAN RINEHART'S TAXIDERMY ARTS SUPPLY COMPANY, DANIEL RINEHART and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Capitol Commission, Inc v. Capitol Ministrie
as 14-1004
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAPITOL COMMISSION, INC
Defendant And 3rd-Party Plaintiff - Appellee: CAPITOL MINISTRIES
Third Party Defendant: JAMES E. YOUNG, DANIEL FILE, GEORGE H. JACKSON and others
Gabbay v. AirPal, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00847
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Gabbay
Defendant: AirPal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Capitol Commission, Inc v. Capitol Ministrie
as 13-2231
Plaintiff - Appellee: CAPITOL COMMISSION, INC
Defendant - Appellant: CAPITOL MINISTRIES
Defendant: JAMES E. YOUNG, GEORGE H. JACKSON, DANIEL FILE and others
Gabbay v. D.T. Davis Enterprises, LTD.
as 3:2013cv00606
Plaintiff: Daniel S. Gabbay
Defendant: D.T. Davis Enterprises, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?