Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv01085
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Linda Gail Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2019cv00909
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Plaintiff:
Roger Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Long v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00737
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Roger Edward Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams, Sr. v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Roger A. Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rogers v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv02737
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Franklin Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Buskirk v. Saul
as 1:2019cv02409
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Buskirk, Jr.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
White v. Saul
as 7:2019cv00467
Plaintiff:
Roger L. White
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rogers v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00154
Plaintiff:
Faye S. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2019cv01041
Plaintiff:
Roger D Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Rogers v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2019cv00896
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Angela Rogers
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
