Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Sherman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Sherman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Skaggs v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Bobbi Skaggs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Teaters v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Teaters
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Bobby Darrick Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Denton v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00738
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jo Denton
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
PRUITT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00603
Plaintiff:
BOBBY PRUITT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Cassell v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jo Edwards Cassell
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lawson v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv00410
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Jo Lawson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grunawalt v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00366
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Bobbi J Grunawalt
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Teaters v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Teaters
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
