Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Kevin Jones v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1151
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Jones v. Kijakakzi
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Farley v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Farley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Towles v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2023cv00312
Plaintiff:
Kevin Towles
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Posey v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kevin Posey
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Posey v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv00159
Defendant:
Kevin Posey and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Reynolds v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02985
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Reynolds
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jacobs v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. Jacobs
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Speight v. Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
Kevin Speight
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eugene Goodall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
