Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Spencer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Spencer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Spencer v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 6:2022cv00035
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Spencer
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Spencer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2021cv03390
Plaintiff:
Karren Spencer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
POOLE, JR v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00133
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY SPENCER POOLE, JR
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL and ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Spencer v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2020cv01863
Plaintiff:
Keith B Spencer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spencer v. Saul
as 5:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Lula Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Spencer v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B Spencer
Defendant:
Commissioner SSA Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Rode v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv03151
Plaintiff:
Paul Spencer Rode
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spencer v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv02230
Plaintiff:
Leon Spencer
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Spencer v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv01096
Plaintiff:
David L. Spencer
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
