Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00186
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Floyd Thompson
Interested Party:
US Attorney-Social Security Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
THOMPSON v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
NAPOLEON THOMPSON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Shannon Depaul Thompson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Brian Thompson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Lisa D. Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
THOMPSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00942
Plaintiff:
DARRYL THOMPSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. Social Security Administration
as 8:2023cv02444
Plaintiff:
Crystal Yvette Thompson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv02420
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
THOMPSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00658
Plaintiff:
TERRY THOMPSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Thompson v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Thompson
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
